The elephant in the room is wearing lipstick.
Mr. Man-on-Dog misses the real beast in the room: Rick Santorum's 12/18/2008 piece in the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Elephant in the Room: Republicans need a new leader, neatly summarizes the bankruptcy of the Republican Party's ideology. In more than 600 words of technical analysis of the Republican's communication process and tactics during the recent Presidential campaign, Santorum devotes exactly 88 words to the substance of the Republican message.
Mr. Man-on-Dog misses the real beast in the room: Rick Santorum's 12/18/2008 piece in the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Elephant in the Room: Republicans need a new leader, neatly summarizes the bankruptcy of the Republican Party's ideology. In more than 600 words of technical analysis of the Republican's communication process and tactics during the recent Presidential campaign, Santorum devotes exactly 88 words to the substance of the Republican message. Santorum's diagnosis of the party's failure "to shape a governing vision and communicate it to the American electorate" includes a breakdown in strategic planning, egos, institutional interests, policy disagreements, indifference, incompetence and failure to use technology as well as the Democrats. He concludes that "our governing philosophy was not rejected in the last two elections; rather we could not plausibly explain how our ideas and actions matched" a philosophy grounded in capitalism, world domination and "the values of our forefathers." No wonder! Nowhere does he suggest that the party's abuse of our constitutional rights; its massive failure to regulate its cronies in the financial markets; its use of torture; its attempts to create an American theocracy; its invasion of other nations; and its cynical base-building campaign to deny gays and lesbians their equal rights may be sources of the fact that the Republican Party was "taken … to the woodshed for a beating in the past two election cycles." The Republic Party of late has some experience with lipstick and should know by now that it can't put it on a pig. Communication that move hearts and minds, garners support and changes behavior must stand on a foundation of actions that are aligned with public expectations and then — and only then — effective communication about those actions. Santorum believes that the Party can return to the time when it "ran circles around the Democrats." Technology is not enough, he says; the Party needs a new chairman to "winsomely" communicate about its "vision." My dictionary defines winsome as "charming, especially because of a naive, innocent quality." Mr. Santorum, if you think winsome will do it for you, then you're going to lose-some more.
"David Kirk is a practitioner of organization, expertise and the ability to work with a client and quickly understand the culture in which he or she operates. His performance has been outstanding and usually above my expectations. I value David as a strategic consultant and offer you the highest recommendation to use his skills and judgment."
Jeffrey C. Richardson, APR, Director, Global Pubic Relations, Amgen, Inc., engaged David Kirk in his positions as a senior communication executive in several pharmaceutical corporations and a federal government agency.
Jeffrey C. Richardson, APR recommends David Kirk
- My RFP Manifesto: No Free Samples
- My One-Hour Chat with McAfee's Tech Support
- Corporate Culture: Your Customers Shall Reap What You Sow
- PR research is like buying low and selling high: almost nobody does it.
- Happy birthday to me.
- From emergence to emergency, don't be caught with your Tweets down.
- Sue me, sue me, go on and sue me.
- Rants, Not Raves
- If you'd rather Twist than Tweet ...
- Octomom and my friend, Joann
